I'd like to leave this one open for now and dig further into the logging issue. Error > Connection rese$ > [2008/08/12 13:08:11, 0] smbd/process.c:srv_send_smb(74) > Error writing 4 bytes to client. -1. (Transport endpoint is not > connected) > > The above is usually a client carballinho View Public Profile View LQ Blog View Review Entries View HCL Entries Find More Posts by carballinho 08-01-2011, 05:12 PM #2 corp769 LQ Guru Registered: Apr 2005 Posts: until about three or four weeks ago. http://xhpcreations.com/getpeername-failed/getpeername-failed-error-was-transport-endpoint-is-not-connected-read-fd-with-timeout.html
Samba problem? add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -d /dev/null -g machines -s /bin/false -M %u ; This next section will simplify password synchronization between ; windows and LINUX. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected Mar 18 12:15:58 samba smbd: [2005/03/18 12:15:58, 0] lib/access.c:check_access(328) Mar 18 12:15:58 samba smbd: [2005/03/18 12:15:58, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr(1000) Mar 18 12:15:58 samba smbd: rylan76 Linux - Software 1 11-13-2008 01:00 AM Samba sharing problem (user permission problem) beikokutn Linux - Software 4 03-11-2008 05:55 AM samba 3 problem - samba PDC can not join https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2011-March/161489.html
Full text and rfc822 format available. The watch is fantastic and by the way thanks for the pen. can you add your /etc/samba/smb.conf and which Windows clients version you are using? Comment 16 Jason Judge 2006-06-25 15:53:34 CEST In case it is any use, here is my log: Jun 25 23:26:07 sme2 smbd: [2006/06/25 23:26:07, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr(1000) Jun 25 23:26:07 sme2 smbd:
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Suggested Solutions Title # Comments Views Activity *STABLE* and free Linux Firewall distribution 6 66 238d OpenVPN routing 2 38 262d Computers missing from Windows Explorer Networks 10 60 54d What The issue that you reported is one that should be reproducible with the live environment of the Desktop CD of the development release - Lucid Lynx. Any ideas on what I should try next?
That is, we revert to port 139 only, and see how we get along. man mount.cifs) Tried this: sudo mount -o smbfs //184.108.40.206/SharedDocs /mnt/SharedDocs_on_SEPCom Then sudo mount -t cifs //220.127.116.11/SharedDocs /mnt/SharedDocs_on_SEPCom All have that time out message. Don't know how to call this. http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-server-73/samba-problem-894965/ Problem lies with Win clients which I wanted to print via samba .
I will do the same test as Paul and will explicitely set smb ports = 139 later today and report back. Join Now For immediate help use Live now! As the link above suggests, blocking port 445 does fix the log noise but may cause share mapping problems. Copy sent to Debian Samba Maintainers
Comment 27 Gordon Rowell 2006-07-17 16:15:58 CEST e-smith-samba: * Tue Jul 18 2006 Gordon Rowell
I had tried setting to 139 only- I think some XP and Win 7 clients make an initial connection to port 445 then get redirected. http://xhpcreations.com/getpeername-failed/getpeername-failed-error-was-socket-is-not-connected-samba.html Runnig on P4 2.8 GHZ with 1 GB of RAM ... However, it needs to be a configurable as some of the reading I have done shows that not listening to port 445 *does* affect more complex SMB networks. Open Source Communities Subscriptions Downloads Support Cases Account Back Log In Register Red Hat Account Number: Account Details Newsletter and Contact Preferences User Management Account Maintenance My Profile Notifications Help Log
Michael, are you running your SME as a PDC? This parameter is not available when Samba listens on port 445, as clients no longer send this information. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected Mar 18 12:15:58 samba smbd: Connection denied from 0.0.0.0 Mar 18 12:15:58 samba smbd: [2005/03/18 12:15:58, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(430) Mar 18 12:15:58 samba smbd: http://xhpcreations.com/getpeername-failed/getpeername-failed-error-was-a-socket-must-be-already-connected.html Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started
Information forwarded to [email protected], Debian Samba Maintainers
That's why I said to try to isolation each port.
Do we have stronger evidence for the existence of problems than this single anecdote? Copy sent to Debian Samba Maintainers
Tried the man page, but it's rather confusing. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected Jun 7 21:08:24 bones smbd: Connection denied from 0.0.0.0 Jun 7 21:08:24 bones smbd: [2006/06/07 21:08:24, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(430) Jun 7 21:08:24 bones smbd: write_socket_data: Connections are not permitted from 0.0.0.0, so it logs that "error" as well. check over here They are due to a windows XP machine on local area network which inquires on both ports 445 and 139.
Error was Transport endpoint is not connected [2011/07/31 07:44:01, 0] lib/util_sock.c:1475(get_peer_addr_internal) getpeername failed.