Home > Gdb Error > Gdb Error Attempt Dereference Generic Pointer

Gdb Error Attempt Dereference Generic Pointer

Goes until the next breakpoint or the end of the program. Once all is well, remove the -g for your final product to reduce the bloat added to the executable. To use malloc, you must include stdlib.h at the top of your program. Variable-length arrays C99 adds the feature of variable-length arrays, where the size of the array is determined at run-time. http://xhpcreations.com/gdb-error/gdb-print-void-pointer.html

Security Patch SUPEE-8788 - Possible Problems? Quick Navigation C++ Programming Top Site Areas Settings Private Messages Subscriptions Who's Online Search Forums Forums Home Forums General Programming Boards C++ Programming C Programming C# Programming Game Programming Networking/Device Communication You must have this cast to keep gdb from giving an "Attempt to dereference a generic pointer." error Displaying the stack backtrace Register Remember Me? But because the array name is constant, you can't assign to it: 1 *a = 12; /* sets zeroth element to 12 */ 2 3 a = &n; /* #### DOESN'T http://stackoverflow.com/questions/20414699/gdb-attempt-to-dereference-generic-pointer

For example, in the short routine: 1 // write 1 + *src to *dst and return *src 2 int 3 copyPlusOne(int * restrict dst, int * restrict src) 4 { 5 c debugging pointers segmentation-fault gdb share|improve this question asked Jan 11 at 18:51 user1610950 457413 Possible duplicate of GDB: Attempt to dereference generic pointer –Eugene Sh. It is good practice to test the return value of malloc whenever you call it. But violating the type system like this will be necessary for some applications, because even the weak type system in C turns out to be too restrictive for writing certain kinds

The block that malloc returns that p points to is allocated off the heap, a region of memory that may also grow over time and starts after the BSS segment. Specifically, it is permitted to Add an integer to a pointer or subtract an integer from a pointer. The array name acts like a constant pointer to the zeroth element of the array. Suppose we want to find a[1][4].

With a bit of pushing and shoving, this can be used to obtain a block of space that for all practical purposes acts just like an array. When to use "bon appetit"? How to use the binomial theorem to calculate binomials with a negative exponent How to limit a xorg installation to a single video driver? http://cs.sou.edu/~nordquip/cs450/gdbhelps.html Attempt to dereference a generic pointer.

Local variables a and p are allocated on the stack, which grows down from somewhere near the top of the address space. The downside of the malloc method is that the caller has to promise to call free on the block later, or you will get a storage leak. 5. mjwood0October 17th, 2007, 11:47 AMAs other's have made mention, there are a few problems. Error occurs on line 62 in linkedlib.c. (I added .txt to the end to make UbuntuForums happy) dwhitney67October 17th, 2007, 09:04 AMright off the bat I can see that your malloc's

is there anybody who has faced this error before? https://ubuntuforums.org/archive/index.php/t-578243.html The valgrind program can help detect such overruns in some cases (see C/valgrind). I'll check out DDD when Nexuiz finishes downloading :p (128K connections are akin to a night in Hell). You may be able to find more up-to-date versions of some of these notes at http://www.cs.yale.edu/homes/aspnes/#classes.

You want this: struct Node* nn = malloc( sizeof( struct Node ) ); and struct List* nl = malloc( sizeof( struct List ) ); dwhitney67October 17th, 2007, 09:35 AMJust ran your Simple template. both int* or both char*). But it seems to be only overwriting the first 12 float or first 48 bytes and not actually shifting, something like a ring buffer.

Declaration is similar to one-dimensional arrays: 1 int a[6][4]; /* declares an array of 6 rows of 4 ints each */ This declaration produces an array of 24 int values, packed Displaying registers and using automatic displays i reg // show the values stored in the registers display/i $pc // automatically display the program counter after every step instruction display $esp // However, it does become useful if we have a two-dimensional array, as otherwise there is no way to compute the length of each row: 1 int 2 sumMatrix(int rows, int cols, To build such structures, the standard C library provides the malloc routine, which asks the operating system for a block of space of a given size (in bytes).

all right. By Tonto in forum Windows Programming Replies: 13 Last Post: 12-26-2006, 03:17 PM Pls repair my basketball program By death_messiah12 in forum C++ Programming Replies: 10 Last Post: 12-11-2006, 04:15 AM Also the second loop you are right.

The time now is 08:18 PM.

Browse other questions tagged c debugging pointers segmentation-fault gdb or ask your own question. Last edited by Sang-drax : Tomorrow at 02:21 AM. Hot Network Questions What happens if one brings more than 10,000 USD with them in the US? De kio “saluton” estas la rekta objekto?

How much interest should I pay on a loan from a friend? reading through the definition of `\cfrac` in AMSMath In Harry Potter book 7, why didn't the Order flee Britain after Harry turned seventeen? Given the declaration inta[50];, only indices from a[0] to a[49] can be used safely. It is also possible to grow or shrink a previously allocated block.

The result is a multidimensional array, where a value in row i and column j is accessed by a[i][j]. It looks to me that either you did not allocate a node, or that you failed to assign it properly prior to examining it's index. Implementation of a generic List True or False? The reason is that, unlike allocations through malloc, variable-length array allocations are typically allocated on the stack (which is often more constrainted than the heap) and have no way of reporting

Make sure you encase that in parenthesis before you use it. Therefore, as someone else mentioned you are simply allocating 4 bytes during the malloc. When you pass a pointer, you should assume that the function can and will change the variable's value. But elements can still be accessed using the a[i][j] syntax.

This is done using the realloc function, which is declared as 1 void *realloc(void *oldBlock, size_t newSize); The realloc function returns a pointer to the resized block. That's why I learned it before C :)). Also, It is called twice with the same destination, overriding the fist call. –Felipe Lavratti Jan 11 at 19:26 calloc(1, sizeof(buffs)) asks for the size of the pointer, not So if there isn't enough room for your variable-length array, odds are you won't find out until a segmentation fault occurs somewhere later in your code when you try to use

The cost is that the code might no longer work if called with aliased pointers. So the problem is that malloc() is allocating only 4 bytes for the list. Mein KontoSucheMapsYouTubePlayNewsGmailDriveKalenderGoogle+ÜbersetzerFotosMehrShoppingDocsBooksBloggerKontakteHangoutsNoch mehr von GoogleAnmeldenAusgeblendete FelderNach Gruppen oder Nachrichten suchen [Pidgin] #16986: crash (SIGABRT) when clicking the tray icon under GNOME 3 Pidgin trac at pidgin.im Fri Apr 1 01:32:29 EDT If you do like this, you need to change the way you call the function, i.e.

The interpretation is that a is an array of 6 objects, each of which is an array of 4 ints. However, by using 'x/xw' to manually dereference a few times, I'm eventually able to print argv[0] (and argv[1]): (gdb) x/xw 0xc + $ebp 0xbfffeba4: 0xbfffec34 (gdb) x/xw 0xbfffec34 0xbfffec34: 0xbfffedc8 (gdb) Here is an example of code using this feature: 1 /* reverse an array in place */ 2 void 3 reverseArray(int n, int a[n]) 4 { 5 /* algorithm: copy to