Home > Gcc Error > Gcc Error Extra Semicolon

Gcc Error Extra Semicolon

otherwise I think that pedantic is a drag on the more important code-level warnings and turning on -Werror for large parts of our codebase. cov(x,y)=0 but corr(x,y)=1 Make all the statements true Physically locating the server How does NumPy solve least squares for underdetermined systems? 5008 out of the box In a long sum, how In a C source file compiled with -pedantic, an extra > semicolon would produce the following error, of course: > > test.c:9: warning: ISO C does not allow extra `;' outside So I think that's a bit of a loaded question; presumably the reason Ted asked me is because he thought there might not be such a condition, and I think I

Test with -pedantic-errors. */ /* Origin: Joseph Myers */ /* { dg-do compile } */ /* { dg-options "-pedantic-errors" } */ struct s0 { ; }; /* { dg-error "error: What kind of distribution is this? Previous by thread: GCC 3.4.3, silencing "extra semicolon" warnings Next by thread: Passing names of libraries to linker. Well, it seems there's no quick workaround for now... :) –Roman D Apr 21 '10 at 8:36 add a comment| 3 Answers 3 active oldest votes up vote 1 down vote

For any headers you maintain, just edit them. What sense of "hack" is involved in "five hacks for using coffee filters"? Here is the test program: > > int main (int argc, char **argv) { > > if (0) { > } else { > }; > > return 0;; > > I will take a look at -Wextra and see if it appears to add any value.

Is there any way to suppress this exact error? If Dumbledore is the most powerful wizard (allegedly), why would he work at a glorified boarding school? Download Now llvm-gcc /gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/struct-semi-3.c Language C Lines 21 MD5 Hash 723a8cffe723996920f72e98e4a05e5a Estimated Cost $283 (why?) Repository https://bitbucket.org/danchr/llvm-gcc View Raw File Find Similar Files View File Tree 1 2 3 4 5 The usual way to do it is to use a union, and it's easy to write a template helper.

Honestly, who cares? > ... Test with -pedantic-errors. */ /* Origin: Joseph Myers */ /* { dg-do compile } */ /* { dg-options "-pedantic-errors" } */ struct s0 { ; }; /* { dg-error "error: Comment 14 Nicholas Nethercote [:njn] 2013-01-17 00:24:44 PST -Wformat is turned on by -Wall, and then -pedantic makes it warn about additional (annoying) things. https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2008-01/msg00221.html True or False?

What should we do for variable-sized stack allocation, since that puts both alloca and variable-sized stack arrays into the penalty box AFAICT? According to ISO C99, section, a lone semicolon is not a "struct_declaration", because a "struct_declarator" and (therefore) a "struct_declarator_list" cannot be empty. With the passing of Thai King Bhumibol, are there any customs/etiquette as a traveler I should be aware of? Boy Sep 12 '12 at 9:19 add a comment| 2 Answers 2 active oldest votes up vote 4 down vote accepted The semicolon warning come courtesy of the -pedantic (or -pedantic-errors)

I will probably roll a public release next month (still need to check the win32 version). https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394311 Extra semicolons appear to be the most commonly warned-about thing. looking at gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.4.3/gcc/… it seems there is no way to do what you want. I'll post the diffs shortly.

References: Oh, I think I can answer my own question. and perhaps other things that we don't trigger at all (what are > they?). De kio “saluton” estas la rekta objekto? more stack exchange communities company blog Stack Exchange Inbox Reputation and Badges sign up log in tour help Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed

Reload to refresh your session. You signed out in another tab or window. For example: are there any things that are -pedantic warnings on gcc, but compilation errors on MSVC? (I vaguely remember there might have been something like that, but not sure if Is there a role with more responsibility?

code in here } ; That semicolon at the end isn't necessary, of course, but I don't think it hurts anything being there. Note: The superfluous semicolon often brings you in trouble with function-like macros and if--else. Is this > not true?

Boy 16.8k50180379 A semicolon following the closing } of an if statement should be perfectly legal.

Yes, there are also edge cases where there's a question of whether a macro has a semicolon at the end. But it's called "pedantic" for a reason. Browse other questions tagged gcc g++ compiler-errors or ask your own question. Comment 3 Mike Shaver (:shaver -- probably not reading bugmail closely) 2008-07-10 12:45:40 PDT More-modern GCC defaults to -pedantic-errors for C++, so we're into this pretty deep now!

I like all the other stuff I get with -Wextra -Wall... reply via email to [Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread] GCC 3.4.3, silencing "extra semicolon" warnings, Dave Steffen, 2005/06/28 Re: GCC 3.4.3, silencing "extra semicolon" warnings, Michael Mair<= Prev struct-semi-3.c[plain text] /* Test diagnostics for missing and extra semicolons in structures. What actually are virtual particles?

Some platforms won't have the ability, and they'll have to pay the heap penalty, but I don't think all platforms should. Is there a Korean word for 'Syllable Block'? Somebody on another mailing list recently pointed out to me > (and this is what brought up this question), that the C++ standard > says: > > statement: > expression-statement > And I couldn't find a list online.

The only useful one I know of is -Wpointer-arith, and we enable that separately. (derf agreed with this on IRC today.) It's hard to tell in general because the GCC man Why is absolute zero unattainable? Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Suppressing “extra ';'” error in GCC when -pedantic is on up vote 4 down vote favorite 1 I'm building my program with By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.Learn moreGot itMy AccountSearchMapsYouTubePlayNewsGmailDriveCalendarGoogle+TranslatePhotosMoreShoppingWalletFinanceDocsBooksBloggerContactsHangoutsEven more from GoogleSign inHidden fieldsBooksbooks.google.comhttps://books.google.com/books/about/DAT10603_Programming_Principle.html?id=78dO3P_QjPgC&utm_source=gb-gplus-shareDAT10603 Programming PrincipleMy libraryHelpAdvanced Book SearchGet print bookNo eBook availablePediaPressAll sellers»Get Textbooks on

If possible, It would be nice to have a more specific error message. Developing web applications for long lifespan (20+ years) Chebyshev Rotation In the United States is racial, ethnic, or national preference an acceptable hiring practice for departments or companies in some situations? Test with -pedantic-errors. */ /* Origin: Joseph Myers */ /* { dg-do compile } */ /* { dg-options "-pedantic-errors" } */ struct s0 { ; }; /* { dg-error "error: I think it's a bit unfair to look only at the warnings that made it in to the tree: there's also the stuff that didn't make it in to the tree

Not the answer you're looking for? Nothing else will work on that case. Check out the latest downloadable searchcode server release published under fair source. Perhaps rightly so, but it's a reality you'll have to face. –Kerrek SB Sep 12 '12 at 10:01 | show 2 more comments up vote 2 down vote The extra semicolon

Alternately, can anyone suggest a legal construct that could be placed between the } and ; (again, say, in a macro definition) to silence the warning? Comment 7 Nicholas Nethercote [:njn] 2013-01-16 16:38:33 PST Created attachment 703103 [details] [diff] [review] removed GCC 4.7 warnings Here's the GCC 4.7 warnings diff, as reported by |mach warnings-list|.